Where would we be without football?
It is a question I am frequently asked, to the point where I would say it is a frequently asked question.
I always reply to this question by saying, "bricklaying".
Because ( and kids, it is okay to start a sentence with the word "because", regardless of what your so-called teachers tell you. This is a perfect example of it ) I would contest that bricklaying is more important than football.
I am currently in negotiations with various professional footballers and various professional bricklayers to set up a fight to prove my point. I reckon an even fairly average bricklayer could beat the Bejesus out of even a top class footballer.
Beckham's agent is refusing to take my calls, but Keith Gillespie has been round my house on several occassions, offering me a "fair dig" even though I have explained to him that I am not a bricklayer.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Interesting debate.
ReplyDeleteI suppose the question is, do bricklayers have the balls? And are the footballers bricking it?
Only time will tell
I suppose bricklayers don't really have the balls. Ball shapes would be wholly inapropriate in the brick-laying game. They would keep rolling off the scaffolding and hitting passers-by on the head with possibly fatal and litigious consequences. And they would probably be more difficult to cement in place than your traditional oblong shaped brick.
ReplyDelete